residue

residue

review: Gary Michael Dault

There’s a famous New Yorker cartoon from the 1960’s showing an alarmed matron gazing in disbelief at an art gallery that is entirely empty.  “But Madame”, explains the frustrated gallery director, “this is the show!”

more...


Something like this might well pop into your mind as you step into Robert Hengeveld’s new installation – or perhaps anti-installation.  For what the young Toronto artist has contrived here is a deliberately evacuated space that looks like a place where something once was.

The floor is a collage of torn-up shards of linoleum and passages of other species of sub-flooring.  One wall gives evidence of having once supported a stove, which has now been unceremoniously yanked away, leaving a damaged gap like the crater let in your mouth when a molar is extracted.  Another wall betrays the fact of having once supported a sink and taps.  You get to reconstruct the room, forensically, from what is left.  But what is also left is a certain wild, abject beauty that derives from the room’s accumulated diminishings.  The place is, in fact, like one big walk-in painting or construction.  The colour (is this accidental, deliberate, merely residual?) is rich and robust.  Once you get used to the slightly perverse fact that you-re enjoying what’s left of a ruin, you start to notice one beautifully undamaged sky-blue wall, an innocent passage amidst the depletion all around.  Another wall is a rich plum-purple, freed now that all the fixtures are gone – into its new status as a painting.  Everything is a mess, yes, but there is a transient colour and shape everywhere in this neo-archaeological site.

Alright, I love painting and maybe I’m forcefully anesthetizing Hengeveld’s provocative site and doing it violence in the process.  But listen, he’s the one leaving behind the pretty pictures!